PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Every year, high school students response to choosing a science stream has indicated a declining pattern. It may be due to the lack of technical application of science that students cannot foresee, thus preventing them from having a clear vision of how science and technology could greatly help daily human life. The study aims to assess the knowledge of high school students through STEM education via a project-based learning method using the hydroponic kit. Seventy students from a government school in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia, participated in this study. The questionnaire was then evaluated based on the scores and displayed improvement. The mean score for the pre-test of general knowledge was M=3.8857, SD=1.41977, and then it increased to M=6.1857, SD=1.21932 for the post-test. In addition, the mean score for the pre-test of hydroponic system advantages was M=6.2000, SD=1.93068, which increased to M=8.8286, SD=0.65875 for the post-test. Meanwhile, the mean score for the pre-test of disadvantages of the hydroponic system was M=7.2571, SD=2.21121, subsequently increasing to M=9.4286, SD=0.73369 for the post-test. Finally, the mean score for the pre-test of practical knowledge was M=9.3429, SD=2.51307, and then increased to M=15.0571, SD=1.84065 for the post-test. Students’ responses to the tests indicated that their interest in the field of science has increased through their involvement in the hydroponic kit project.

• Anwar, N., Masrek, M. N., & Sani, M. K. J. A. (2018). Information technology infrastructure flexibility: A review from previous studies and implications for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 236-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i3/4362

• Banning, W., & Sullivan, G. (2011). Lens on outdoor learning (1st ed). Redleaf Press.

• Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy-practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9

• Baran, E., Canbazoglu-Bilici, S., & Mesutoglu, C. (2015). Fen, Teknoloji, Muhendislik ve Matematik (FeTeMM) Spotu Gelistirme Etkinligi [Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Spot Development Event]. Arastırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, 5(2), 60-69.

• Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 4(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338

• Chua, K. H., Mageswary, K., & Zain, A. N. (2017). Influences of gender and school location on science environment in Malaysia lower secondary schools. In N. J. Ahmad & M. J. Zakaria (Eds.), Revitalising science teaching and learning culture towards sustainable living (pp. 1-13). SEAMEO RECSAM.

• Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States [Paper presentation]. The 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

• Ernst, J., & Burcak, F. (2019). young children’s contributions to sustainability: The influence of nature play on curiosity, executive function skills, creative thinking, and resilience. Sustainability, 11(15), 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154212

• Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y

• Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271

• Hashim, H., Ali, M. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Shodiqi, H. A. (2020). nourishing students’ creative thinking through exemplar STEM lesson embedded during extracurricular activities. International STEM Journal, 1(1), 27-37.

• Heng, C. K., Karpudewan, M., & Md Zain, A. N. (2017). Influences of gender and school location on science learning environment in Malaysian lower secondary schools. In N. J. Ahmad, & M. J. Zakaria (Eds.), Revitalising science teaching and learning culture towards sustainable living (pp. 1-13). SEAMEO RECSAM.

• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

• Ismail, M. H., Salleh, M. F. M., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2019). The issues and challenges in empowering STEM on science teachers in Malaysia secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 430-444.

• Jeong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). The effect of a climate change monitoring program on students’ knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1321-1338.

• Kanadli, S. (2019). A meta-summary of qualitative findings about STEM education. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 959-976.

• Koul, R. B., Fraser, B. J., Maynard, N., & Tade, M. (2018). Evaluation of engineering and technology activities in primary schools in terms of learning environment, attitudes and understanding. Learning Environments Research, 21(2), 285-300.

• Lee, M.-H., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H.-Y. (2019). STEM education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and development. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 28(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z

• Lou, S. J., Tsai, H. Y., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). STEM online project-based collaborative learning for female high school students. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal, 30, 41-61.

• McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel A. D. (2015). Thirst for knowledge: The effects of curiosity and interest on memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039801

• Munandar, U. S. C. (1999). Mengembangkan bakat dan kreativitas anak sekolah. Petunjuk bagi guru dan orangtua [Develop the talents and creativity of school children. Instructions for teachers and parents]. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

• Razali, F. (2021). Exploring crucial factors of an interest in STEM career model among secondary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14222a

• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

• Shah, P. E., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B., & Kaciroti, N. (2018). Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement. Pediatric Research, 84, 380-386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0039-3

• Shaharuddin, W. Y. W., Ahmad, M., & Omar, S. (2020). Influence resources and power from the teachers’ perspective: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4s), 3486-3495.

• Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

• Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

• Tumuti, D. W., Wanderi, P. M., & Lang, C. (2013). Benefit of university-industry partnerships: The case of Kenyatta University and Equity Bank. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7), 26-33.

• Tytler, R., & Aranda, G. (2015). Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 425-446.

• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Technology and innovation report 2021: Catching technological waves: Innovation with equity. https://unctad.org/page/technology-and-innovation-report-2021

• Wee, S. T., & Abas, M. A. (2015). Good governance practices in national solid waste management policy implementation: A pilot study on solid waste corporation’s staff in Batu Pahat, Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(31), 445-451.

• Widya, Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012208. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208

• Yuk, F. H. (2008). Reflections on school career education in Hong Kong: Responses to Norman C. Gyber, Darryl Takizo Yagi, and Sang Min Lee & Eunjoo Yang. Asian Journal of Counselling, 15(2), 185-205.